The regulation of virtual asset exchanges in Hong Kong takes effect, facing challenges in compliance and innovation.

robot
Abstract generation in progress

Hong Kong Virtual Asset Exchange Regulation Enters a Critical Stage

The Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission's regulatory measures for virtual asset exchanges have officially come into effect, marking a new phase in the development of the Web3 industry in the region. Although some exchanges have withdrawn their license applications, there are still some platforms operating in the gray area, raising concerns within the industry about the enforcement of regulations.

It is understood that most offshore exchanges have stopped accepting new user registrations from Hong Kong, but they are still providing services to existing Hong Kong users. This practice has raised legal risks. An experienced lawyer stated that providing virtual asset services without a license is illegal, and offenders could face fines of up to HKD 5 million and 7 years in prison.

Currently, only two exchange platforms in Hong Kong have obtained formal licenses, while 11 others are in the pending licensing status. At the same time, the license applications of 11 applicants have been returned, rejected, or withdrawn. It is reported that some exchanges withdrew because they could not meet the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission's requirement of not serving users from mainland China.

Insiders point out that although a license can be reapplied for after changing the legal entity, it may not be possible to use a brand similar to the existing offshore exchange to avoid public confusion regarding the platform's compliance. This reflects the challenges faced by Hong Kong regulators in balancing compliance and innovation.

Some experts believe that the compliance and operational costs of virtual asset exchanges in Hong Kong are relatively high, which may be one of the reasons why several exchanges have chosen to withdraw their licenses. At the same time, there are also views that Hong Kong's policies for promoting Web3 development lack comprehensive consideration and are overly reliant on traditional financial regulatory thinking, which may affect industry innovation.

In the future, how Hong Kong regulators effectively supervise "clear but not retreating" unlicensed exchanges, and how to promote innovation while ensuring compliance, will be key to the development of the Web3 industry in Hong Kong. This not only concerns the future of Hong Kong's fintech but will also have a profound impact on the global regulatory landscape for virtual assets.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Share
Comment
0/400
EthMaximalistvip
· 07-16 09:38
Regulations are just empty talk; the free market is key.
View OriginalReply0
GameFiCriticvip
· 07-15 16:14
Rising costs make Rug Pulls easier, right?
View OriginalReply0
NFTDreamervip
· 07-13 11:35
Compliance and speculation are too difficult to balance.
View OriginalReply0
TrustMeBrovip
· 07-13 11:35
It's just a regulation for personal gain.
View OriginalReply0
ChainPoetvip
· 07-13 11:30
Rug Pull的不如偷着活的
View OriginalReply0
DecentralizeMevip
· 07-13 11:16
A bunch of rules and regulations, it's lost its meaning.
View OriginalReply0
ZkProofPuddingvip
· 07-13 11:12
Regulation is here, it's all over.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate app
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)